Sunday, August 30, 2009

Is It Time For Todd Eachus To Resign???

Editorial published in the Hazleton Standard Speaker, Citizen's Voice, Republican Herald Pottsville, News Item Shamokin, Sunday Review Towand.

It is a stinging indictment of the legislators in Harrisburg, but particularly pointed at the lack of leadership including House Majority Leader Todd Eachus. His dismal failure at his first crack at majority leader demonstrates what everyone has known all along. Just like Obama you can buy Eachus on QVC, well not literally, but he is a canned package and presentation. The record shows that what he says is not what he really is or does. He has the public hoodwinked about PACE and I blame the mainstream media for not doing its investigative obligation.

Eachus demonstrated his inability to work with others in promoting collaborative cooperation in an effective manner. When his interests directly conflict with the interest of others he is not interested in creating win-win situations. He believes in the zero sum world where the gains for him are only obtained at a cost to others. Instead he should be looking to bridge disparate interests. Issues on the table are as important as issues off the table. His bias promotes competition and stifles cooperation.

Lou Barletta has been Mayor of Hazleton for 8 of the 12 years Eachus has been a House Representative. His disdain for Lou Barletta has cost Hazleton residents in money and growth. He has failed to get the biggest city in his district its fair share of state funding due to his ongoing blatant efforts to tarnish the Mayor. I challenge him to list the accomplishments he brought to the City of Hazleton.

Todd Eachus can face serious competition for being guilty of the same transgressions Frank Harrison committed in the 11th Congressional district that allowed Paul Kanjorski to win the seat from him. He is ignoring the biggest Democratic base in his district. Being drunk with power has not allowed him to sober enough to see the light, maybe one too many political science courses at Pitzer College.

His blind rage has stifled cooperation. He carried that same attitude to the office of House Majority Leader. He may blame Lou Barletta but if the same thing is happening in Harrisburg there is one common denominator, Eachus.



Over the course of the eight-week state budget impasse, lawmakers have succeeded only in converting a political failure into a moral failure. The crisis is not just financial in nature. It is a colossal failure of governanceIt is apparent that Pennsylvania suffers not just a budget deficit, but an even more damaging leadership deficit.

Pennsylvania's most vulnerable citizens have begun to pay the price for their government's inability to carry out its most fundamental task.

And, for all of state politicians' mewling about their fidelity to taxpayers, their failure to adopt a state budget already has begun to adversely affect those taxpayers at the local level. Several Pennsylvania school districts already have arranged for loans to cover the state government's failure to provide the first two state subsidy payments of the new fiscal year. The cost of that borrowing will be added to local school budgets. So far, school districts statewide have been denied about $1.2 billion in anticipated state subsidies.

Vulnerable citizens harmed

Social service agencies, the safety net that ensures quality of life and, in some cases, life itself for the poor, the very young and the very old, have begun to suspend services. Thousands of vulnerable citizens have nowhere else to turn.

Lawmakers continue to collect their pay, however, with a few notable exceptions. Rep. Kevin Murphy of Lackawanna County, for example, has declined to accept his pay until a budget is adopted.

Pennsylvania's government faces the same economic crisis as every other state government. But 48 of those other state governments have managed to pass a budget, despite a wide array of related problems. Even California, with one of the worst state budget deficits in American history, has a budget. So does New York, even as the legislature in Albany wrangles with a crippling in-house political crisis. Only Connecticut and Pennsylvania are without budgets.

Time for leadership

Many proposals are available to shape a budget compromise. It's long past time not only for a budget but for leadership. The governor's budget proposals are clear, as are the Senate's, along with those of both caucuses in the House. There is, alas, no apparent authority for the Legislature to be forced to remain in continuous session until it emerges with a budget. But that does not preclude lawmakers from sequestering themselves - or at least sequestering the legislative caucus leaders - basically locking the Capitol door until they emerge with a balanced budget. They should do so as public penance for their moral failure, but more important, to end the suffering that they have imposed on their fellow citizens through fruitless political posturing.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Throw the bum out

Anonymous said...

its a joke to say that Todd Eachus hasn't brought anything to the city of Hazleton. i did a search on the Standard Speaker website and found a fifteen thousand dollar grant for upgrades to police radios cost i would think that the mayor would fund, a ten thousand dollar grant for breathing apparatus for the city fire department, a cost i would think the mayor would fund, and recently a seven MILLION dollar grant to the Greater Hazleton Joint Sewer Authority. then i found on www.recovery.com a 12.5 million dollar grant for the city's water authority. The grant was approved by the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority in April 2009 and construction began within four months. And i know there is more than that.

McGruff said...

Anon 9:33PM..pay attention...what did I post...I didn't state he failed to bring any money to Hazleton...here is my post "He has failed to get the biggest city in his district its fair share of state funding due to his ongoing blatant efforts to tarnish the Mayor."

Obviously you are not from Hazleton. If you were you would know that the Greater Hazleton Joint Sewer Authority is actually located in Hazle Township and is not a city operation. Likewise the
Hazleton City Authority water department actually owns lines in many surrounding communities and the money it recieves is not just customers located within the boundaries of the City of Hazleton. It's board is independent of the City.

And that would be www.recovery.org not .com..The only money coming to the City of Hazleton is stimulus money for the Intermodal Center and that money is from the federal government, not the state.

As for the $12.5 million dollar grant you refer to another strikeout. Here is the link to the article about the grant. You will notice that it was Senator Ray Musto who was instrumental in that grant. The grant allowed them to retire existing debt so that the ability to fund eight new projects could proceed.

Here is another link.

[Hazelton City Authority received a $12.5 million grant to replace more than three miles of drinking water distribution mains, upgrade a pump station, replace a water storage tank and rebuild three water filters to reduce water
leaks and improve service.]

And this link will explain that the grant affects 13 municipalities in a 3 county area, not just the City of Hazleton.

[Awarded through the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority, the $12,508,600 grant will help accomplish eight water system projects effecting 14,200 households in 13 municipalities across a three-county area.

The HCA system improvements will affect households in the Luzerne, Carbon and Schuylkill counties, including the City of Hazleton; the boroughs of West Hazleton, Beaver Meadows and Jeddo, and the townships of Banks, Lausanne, Packer, Black Creek, Foster, Hazle, Sugarloaf, Delano and Mahanoy.]

Again, my challenge to Eachus is to demonstrate a significant amount of money coming to the government entity known as the City of Hazleton. I can cite the money he has supported for Wilkes Barre, Scranton, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, etc. I want to know what he can claim for Hazleton.

Anonymous said...

Mr McGruff
you are correct i am not from the area, but i do have concerns. i got to know about the Mayor from his congressional elections, and all through that i heard about how he wanted to improve northeastern PA not just the city. now you want me to believe that the Mayor only is concerned about the city.

here is what has struck me, show me proof that the Mayor has asked the state guy for money and that he didn't come through for him. all i have is you saying Eachus didn't deliver but those that ask are the ones to get. so please post like you do all those links and show me letters that ask for help.

thanks.

McGruff said...

Anon,

Thank you for the reply and would be happy to oblige.

Let's start here. Eachus, Barletta spar over pension fund help That pension issue lasted for over 2 years. Keep in mind that Eachus is House Majority Leader. Every piece of legislation goes through him. Yet Hazleton has a problem getting something done.

Now take a look at this release from Eachus. See how he makes it look like its going to the city but I proved the authority is not the city.

Here is a link to my post that showed how many laws Eachus voted Yes on to help other municipalities.

Now back to requests...Look at this article. Then look at my post so you can view the ad.

It's so bad that Kanjorski tried to boost Eachus with this press release from 2004. Take note that the money came from the federal government.

Google "eachus hazleton help" and tell me how successful you are.

The Mayor called his office to set up a telephone conference to ask for help. His aide stated Eachus wouldn't be able to talk to him for 2 weeks. WTF.

Here's the Mayor's office phone number. 570-459-4910. Ask the Mayor yourself what assistance he has asked for and what he has received.

Just a point. Barletta is still Mayor of Hazleton. It is his obligation to put the City first. He would have made a difference in Northeastern PA. If it wasn't for Obama Kanjorski would be on the outside looking in right now. Even he admitted that the night before the election. His polls numbers were the same as Barletta- losing.

McGruff said...

You got off point. My point-Eachus is ignoring the biggest city in his district over politics. The city is two thirds Democrats. Who is he really hurting? He is hurting the people who put him in AND are part of his party, not the Mayor. That is arrogance, not smart politics. Eachus feels he is invincible.

And there is a whole lot more. Eachus successfully secured $250 million for a fantasy cargo airport proposal for a huge donor of his, the airport was a private venture.

I challenge Eachus to come up with 10% of that figure that was secured for the City Of Hazleton. Maybe the Mayor needs to give Eachus $18,000.00 in donations and jet rides for some consideration.

Anonymous said...

Mr. McGruff
i enjoy going from one blog to another actually questioning statements put out. i might not be from the area but you aren't a student of politics either. i looked back at Eachus's last election against a Shamany. in the city of hazelton eachus won by just over 2900 votes and won the entire election by over 8400. so that has the city vote margin just less than 35%. that leaves the rest of the district at 65%. i guess math isnt on the mayors side. but then again i just read numbers put out by the county election department. by the way, this eachus didnt lose a polling place anywhere in this race.
and i read your link, you said he got 250 million successfully, i read it a different way.no where can i find that the state gave this amount of money to anyone, am i wrong? i would hope you are about accuracy and not distortion.

but i have to ask, it is evident you are pro barletta and anti eachus. what caused that. in reading your other posts you let on you know eachus personally... he do something to you?:

i do enjoy the banter, please don't take it personal.

McGruff said...

You are not wrong about someone acutally taking possession of the $250 million. You need to read about Robert Powell and the Luzerne County Judge scandal to see why it wasn't disbursed.

http://www.timesleader.com/news/hottopics/judges

I was very accurate about Eachus fighting to get the money. He had to battle Senator Ray Musto.

Anonymous said...

Mr McGrudd
i don't know what you want me to read. i looked at the link you showed me but no where did it say there was actual money dispersed for this project. also, when you didn't reply to my other comments on the election results and your relationship with Eachus, does that mean you concede to me on those points?

and for the 12.5 million dollar grant, i read in there where a board member, Ammon gives Eachus credit.
one last thought before i go for a few beers, i called the Mayors office the other day, got no live body to answer, left a message to have someone get back to me. nothing as of today......
im sure he is busy....

what are your thoughts on the Mayor running for Congress? i would think he takes one last shot, mid term elections always go to the party other than the President. your thoughts?

McGruff said...

Anon,

I will respond to all your concerns.

1. I never said the money was dispersed. I stated that Eachus fought hard to secure and did secure $250 million for the Cargo Airport. He faced stiff opposition from the Sentaor representing the district because the Senator knew the project was a no-go from the start. If he is willing to fight hard for a project where the land is mostly out of his district why won't he expend the same effort in his district?

Robert Powell was a principal in the project. You can view videos of him and Todd Eachus making platitudes on the merits of this fantasy at wwww.gladstonepartners.com. Robert Powell has been charged and plead guilty to offenses related to a juvenile detention scandal, the detention center of which he was a prinicpal partner. As a result of the FBI investigations into two Luzerne County judges and their relationship with Powell and charges filed the airport is no longer a consideration. Hence the money never made it to Gladstone. That does not erase the effort that Eachus expended for a significant donor to his campaign. And that does not erase the vote for the money. So there is no distortion.

2. Student of politics- Don't assume something of someone you don't know, and please don't take that personal. Did you look at the last Mayoral election for the City of Hazleton? Barletta won the primary on the Democratic side with a last minute one week write-in campaign against a former Mayor who decided to run for Mayor again. In the general election he took over 90% of the vote. Mind you that vote comes from a city with a 2 to 1 Democratic to Republican registration ratio. So as far as math goes what you are reading is only part of the story. Eachus would have his hands full if the Mayor were to decide to run against him.

McGruff said...

3. Eachus popularity- just like Paul Kanjorski until the last election Eachus has not had any serious challengers to face. You need to read this previous post by me. http://sightsonpennsylvania.blogspot.com/2009/08/more-bonusgate-highlights-from-mike.html Replace Legislator X with Todd Eachus. From those emails it is evident that state resources and employees were used against Shamany so I would hardly call his results a valid election. These emails are part of AG Corbetts probe of Bonusgate.

4. Todd Eachus disappointed me as a representative. In following the leadership track he forgot about the largest city in his district. I can't speak for him but he acts like no matter how much he ignores Hazleton he will be re-elected. He should be a student of the Frank Harrison-Paul Kanjorski election. Kanjorski successfully portrayed Harrison as unresponsive to the district and won. And that was Kanjorski's fourth attempt at the seat.

He promotes Ed Rendell's agenda at the district expense. It is no secret that Eachus introduces legislation on behalf of the governor regardless of the way voters in his district may feel.

He also is very disingenous about his efforts to help senior citizens. I discovered documents in the Department of Aging which directly contradict most claims he made about helping seniors. Two years ago legislation was passed to save $170 million per year in the PACE program. He promised that 120,000 seniors would be added to the program. I called the Department of Aging. Today there are less seniors on the program than when that legislation passed. That means $340 million in savings occured in the last two years. Where did the money go if it didn't go to placing 120,000 more seniors on the PACE?

In any relationship trust is key. At this point he has lost my trust to be a spokesperson for the people he represents. He forgot who put him in office.

5. Getting back to item 2. Don't misconstrue Barletta's loss to Kanjorski as a victory for Kanjo. He was lucky he got to ride the Obama tsunami. Without he was dead in the water and he knew it. He still is not out of the water. I give him credit for trying to reinvent his persona to the public. But he has failed to have one healthcare meeting face to face with the people in his district. He stated on WILK that he doesn't have time for town hall meetings. The travel would take up too much of his time. Well,, isn't that what we are paying him for??? He is eloquent in his speech but also out of touch as are many in Washington. When dissent is labeled as un-American those elected officials never read the history of this country. It was founded on dissent and molded along the way by dissent. If that statement is untrue slavery would still be in existence.

McGruff said...

Our constitution provided for 2 year Congressional terms. Back in the 17-1800's those men were farmers, business people, lawyers, etc. There were no cars for transportation, just horse and buggy. The Potamac as it was established in 1800 was not the expansive domain we now know as Washington, D.C.

Although patterned after the House of Commons I believe our forefathers never meant for career politicians as we see it today. There were lobbyists back then but not the menagery of intertwining relationships that blur the duty of loyalty incumbent upon elected officials to the voters. Teddy Roosevelt saw the need for campaign finance reform but we forgot that history lesson.

Washington has lost is way of common current for the attainment of common purposes. So has Eachus. His partisan politics only serve his ego, not his constituents. He has failed as House Majority Leader because he lacks the leadership skills in the art of negotiation, witness Pennsylvania as the only state without a passed budget.

We are taught that there are three branches of government. In reality there are four, that being the voters. It is time he meets their displeasure at poor performance.

Anonymous said...

oh now you are letting your dislike for the guy cloud your judgment. first of all, if you are truly are for term limits, why aren't you criticizing Barletta, it is his third term isn't it? i know he tried his hardest to get out of that elected spot, but he didnt quite do it. but i give him credit for trying.
as far as a Eachus/Barletta match up, you really cant compare their past elections to say how one would do against the other. from what i read and hear, people love Eachus as much as they do Barletta. and Shamany was a viable candidate against Eachus. Heck i remember the Mayor endorsing, Parrick, Rodgers and then Shamany, so if the Mayor had influence on his voters Eachus should of been defeated.
and as far as this budget, i will admit i am a Democrat, so as i read with interest on this subject, it isnt lack of leadership, it is the Republicans refusing to tax natural gas business, tobacco companies and other special interest groups. so i cant agree with your assessment on that . on that note, Happy Labor Day....enjoy your self and be safe....

McGruff said...

Typical spin. When did I say I wasn't for term limits for a Mayor?? I do believe that Barletta should move on...These offices aren't dynasties. I believe that he can better serve this area in a higher office but I also believe that he must not turn that office into a career. I am also in favor of Republicans who are in office in Harrisburg too long to vacate immediately.

I believe it is time for politicians to hear the voice of the voters, the fourth branch of government. And we won't get their attention until a mass loss for both parties occurs.

I think the birth of the Blue Dog Democrats demonstrates the need for a central thinking in Washington as opposed to polarized views from both sides.

The Pennsylvania legislature perpetuates itself and its bloated staff. Read the local opinion written yesterday on the subject.

http://www.standardspeaker.com/opinion/trim_bloated_staffs_in_state_legislature

Again read the local opinion about lack of leadership.

http://www.republicanherald.com/news/our_views_lawmakers_owe_citizens_a_budget_-_now

As far as blaming Republicans here is a response to that charge.

http://www.standardspeaker.com/opinion/letters/governor_deserves_blame_for_budget_mess

Don't blame the Republicans for a no go on natural gas tax revenue...Rendell was the one who conceded to that industry according to this article. http://www.citizensvoice.com/news/business/rendell_drops_proposed_natural_gas_tax_for_now "Gov. Ed Rendell is accommodating industry requests and backing away from a state severance tax on natural gas production, which would have added revenue to prop up a new state budget."

Typical democratic philosophy... tax, tax, tax,...I will consider that option as soon as the legislature "takes a hit" which is a famous Eachus quote. Decrease the size of the legislature..decrease the size of the staff...according to the Bonusgate indictment the staff are only needed for political campaigns and legislative policy, not state work or state issues.

Pennsylvanians pay enough tax...why do many corporations incorporate in Delaware and not Pennsylvania? Why is the gas tax in Delaware alot less? Why is our sales tax at 6%? Rendell already raised the income tax during his tenure and wants more. Why?? Tax natural gas companies, that will only be passed onto the consumer..who are mostly Democrats in this state...Tobacco companies..again a significant industry in PA but look at the tobacco tax where it is at now...

Look at Pennsylvania figures for Medicaid and the prison populations.

Prison population up 40% in 9 years... http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/state/s_639625.html

Here is a document that contains a graph on the rise of Medicaid recipients in this state...almost 2 million out of 12 million residents

http://www.pamedicaid.pitt.edu/documents/MA%20Basics%20FS%2008.pdf

So tax tax tax to support those problems...

I think you are forgetting the age of the population in Pennsylvania...22% are 18 and under plus 15.3% are 65 and older...That's 37% of the population who can't afford to pay exhorbitant tax rates...

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/42000.html

We are only one of 9 states with a full time legislature...Why???

http://www.phillynorml.org/forum/index.php?topic=675.0

McGruff said...

Before you want tax increases look at this state like a business person would.. You can't raise prices and hope customers will be happy. You also must control your expenses. The legislature received a 50% pension increase in 2001, and that's both Republicans and Democrats...Who is footing the bill..of course the taxpayers...

In 2005 the PA legislature approved an illegal pay raise of 16 to 34%.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=8309

Todd Eachus and 52 others have yet to pay that money back after it was repealed.

Read John Micek's Allentown Call opinion on Lord Todd of Eachus and disingenuous statements..
http://blogs.mcall.com/capitol_ideas/2009/08/the-wonderful-wizard-of-todd.html

You are making me work but I am enjoying the challenge...Lastly lets get back to Eachus vs. Barletta.

Eachus backed Jack Mundie when he ran against Barletta...lost

Eachus backed Marsicano when he ran against Barletta...lost

Eachus backed Robert Nilles in the most recent primary council race...lost..

Eachus opposed all three elections of Barletta...lost...

I think you need to get better arguments. I am only presenting the facts as you asked me to.

McGruff said...

I forgot to post that the casinos are taxed at a 55% rate. Property tax relief for Pennsylvanians was part of that legislation but property owners have yet to see any of that money.

http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=ind_focus.story&STORY=/www/story/08-04-2009/0005071454&EDATE=

Tax collections by the Commonwealth on that amount last month, based on the 55% rate, were $98,534,824, an average of $3.18 million per day.

I fail to see you discuss Eachus's role in the Bonusgate scandal. Is there a reason???

Anonymous said...

you must have missed this site.

http://www.governor.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=3039&mode=2

and if you go to it you will see the property owners have received $136.00 a year in rebates on their property taxes thanks to gaming funds.

Hazle-township Thank God said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
McGruff said...

I removed your post because you indicate you are from Hazle Township when in fact your ISP is Newfoundland PA. Nice try but don't do it again.